Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wireguard: noise: reject response consumption after intermediate initiation
Two threads begin processing the identical response message, received
twice. The first thread, A, runs. While it's running, the second one,
B, gets partway through, and during that slow calculation, or even while
blocking on down_write(), A completes and then also a handshake
initiation that's already been queued up runs in thread C, which itself
takes that same down_write(). The handshake initiation creation
succeeds, and sets the state back to waiting-for-response, and calls
up_write(), at which point thread B resumes, because either its finished
its calculations or was finally allowed to acquire down_write(). Thread
B then copies the state back to the peer, and begins a new session,
using that state, which is the same session as the one made in thread A.
Thread A Thread B Thread C
down_read()
sA = handshake->state
memcpy(cA, handshake->crypto)
up_read()
if (sA != 1)
goto fail
slow_crypto(cA)
down_read()
sB = handshake->state
memcpy(cB, handshake->crypto)
up_read()
if (sB != 1)
goto fail
slow_crypto(cB)
down_write()
if (sA != handshake->state)
goto fail
memcpy(handshake->crypto, cA)
handshake->state = 2
up_write()
down_write()
if (handshake->state != 2)
goto fail
derive_session(handshake->crypto)
up_write()
down_write()
slow_crypto(handshake->crypto)
handshake->state = 1
up_write()
down_write()
if (sB != handshake->state)
goto fail
memcpy(handshake->crypto, cB)
handshake->state = 2
up_write()
down_write()
if (handshake->state != 2)
goto fail
derive_session(handshake->crypto)
up_write()
This seems basically impossible to hit in a meaningful way in practice,
but ensure that it absolutely cannot happen by comparing the ephemeral
private key that's on the stack with the latest one that the peer's
handshake state has.
wireguard: noise: reject response consumption after intermediate initiation
Two threads begin processing the identical response message, received
twice. The first thread, A, runs. While it's running, the second one,
B, gets partway through, and during that slow calculation, or even while
blocking on down_write(), A completes and then also a handshake
initiation that's already been queued up runs in thread C, which itself
takes that same down_write(). The handshake initiation creation
succeeds, and sets the state back to waiting-for-response, and calls
up_write(), at which point thread B resumes, because either its finished
its calculations or was finally allowed to acquire down_write(). Thread
B then copies the state back to the peer, and begins a new session,
using that state, which is the same session as the one made in thread A.
Thread A Thread B Thread C
down_read()
sA = handshake->state
memcpy(cA, handshake->crypto)
up_read()
if (sA != 1)
goto fail
slow_crypto(cA)
down_read()
sB = handshake->state
memcpy(cB, handshake->crypto)
up_read()
if (sB != 1)
goto fail
slow_crypto(cB)
down_write()
if (sA != handshake->state)
goto fail
memcpy(handshake->crypto, cA)
handshake->state = 2
up_write()
down_write()
if (handshake->state != 2)
goto fail
derive_session(handshake->crypto)
up_write()
down_write()
slow_crypto(handshake->crypto)
handshake->state = 1
up_write()
down_write()
if (sB != handshake->state)
goto fail
memcpy(handshake->crypto, cB)
handshake->state = 2
up_write()
down_write()
if (handshake->state != 2)
goto fail
derive_session(handshake->crypto)
up_write()
This seems basically impossible to hit in a meaningful way in practice,
but ensure that it absolutely cannot happen by comparing the ephemeral
private key that's on the stack with the latest one that the peer's
handshake state has.
Published:
2026-10-23
Score:
n/a
EPSS:
n/a
KEV:
No
Analysis
Analysis and contextual insights are available on OpenCVE Cloud.
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | unaffected |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Linux | Linux | affected |
|
No data.
No data.
No data available yet.
Remediation
No solution or workaround provided in the CVE record.
Additional remediation guidance may be available on OpenCVE Cloud.
Tracking
Sign in to view the affected projects.
Advisories
No advisories yet.
References
History
Fri, 23 Oct 2026 12:45:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wireguard: noise: reject response consumption after intermediate initiation Two threads begin processing the identical response message, received twice. The first thread, A, runs. While it's running, the second one, B, gets partway through, and during that slow calculation, or even while blocking on down_write(), A completes and then also a handshake initiation that's already been queued up runs in thread C, which itself takes that same down_write(). The handshake initiation creation succeeds, and sets the state back to waiting-for-response, and calls up_write(), at which point thread B resumes, because either its finished its calculations or was finally allowed to acquire down_write(). Thread B then copies the state back to the peer, and begins a new session, using that state, which is the same session as the one made in thread A. Thread A Thread B Thread C down_read() sA = handshake->state memcpy(cA, handshake->crypto) up_read() if (sA != 1) goto fail slow_crypto(cA) down_read() sB = handshake->state memcpy(cB, handshake->crypto) up_read() if (sB != 1) goto fail slow_crypto(cB) down_write() if (sA != handshake->state) goto fail memcpy(handshake->crypto, cA) handshake->state = 2 up_write() down_write() if (handshake->state != 2) goto fail derive_session(handshake->crypto) up_write() down_write() slow_crypto(handshake->crypto) handshake->state = 1 up_write() down_write() if (sB != handshake->state) goto fail memcpy(handshake->crypto, cB) handshake->state = 2 up_write() down_write() if (handshake->state != 2) goto fail derive_session(handshake->crypto) up_write() This seems basically impossible to hit in a meaningful way in practice, but ensure that it absolutely cannot happen by comparing the ephemeral private key that's on the stack with the latest one that the peer's handshake state has. | |
| Title | wireguard: noise: reject response consumption after intermediate initiation | |
| First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
| Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| References |
|
|
MITRE
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published:
Updated: 2026-10-23T12:22:47.559Z
Reserved: 2026-09-25T10:25:14.388Z
Link: CVE-2026-99059
Vulnrichment
No data.
NVD
Status : Received
Published: 2026-10-23T13:17:29.620
Modified: 2026-10-23T13:17:29.620
Link: CVE-2026-99059
Redhat
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
Weaknesses
No weakness.