Export limit exceeded: 50480 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2350 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-89203 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to various database queries, allowing users to retrieve system-wide information that is not intended for their privilege level. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gather sensitive information about the system's infrastructure, including details on all devices, substations, users, and scheduled activities. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89198 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize the filename of firmware files uploaded to the system. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89199 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to sensitive configuration items via specific database queries. This could allow an authenticated attacker to retrieve administrative credentials for various internal systems, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89206 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to modify the state of scheduled actions. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to retry, stop, or delete scheduled tasks without proper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89196 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in facility names processed during the Bulk Import/Export workflow. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89197 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Value field of notification conditions processed during the Notification Profile configuration. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89200 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 6.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Name and Value fields for custom file labels. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89201 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in device group or facility names processed during the Bulk Export workflow. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89202 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform authorization checks for device disconnection requests. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to disconnect active sessions of other users, including administrators, leading to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89204 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to database queries used for subnet management. This could allow an authenticated attacker to read, modify, or delete subnet configurations, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and data manipulation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89205 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to schedule special operations. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to schedule unauthorized operations on devices. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40946 | 1 Siemens | 30 Blueplanet 100 Nx3 M8, Blueplanet 100 Tl3 Gen2, Blueplanet 105 Tl3 and 27 more | 2026-10-13 | 8.3 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in blueplanet 100 NX3 M8 (All versions), blueplanet 100 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 105 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 105 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 110 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 NX3 M10 (All versions), blueplanet 125 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 137 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 155 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 155 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 165 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 165 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 3.0 TL3-60.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet gridsave 110 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91), blueplanet gridsave 137 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91), blueplanet gridsave 92.0 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91). A CRC16-based algorithm for generating Technical Service credentials could allow an attacker to derive the credentials from the devices serial number and misuse them to gain unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41125 | 1 Siemens | 29 Blueplanet 100 Nx3 M8, Blueplanet 100 Tl3 Gen2, Blueplanet 105 Tl3 and 26 more | 2026-10-13 | 6 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in blueplanet 100 NX3 M8 (All versions), blueplanet 100 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 105 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 105 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 110 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 NX3 M10 (All versions), blueplanet 125 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 137 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 155 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 155 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 165 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 165 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet gridsave 110 TL3-S (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet gridsave 137 TL3-S (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet gridsave 92.0 TL3-S (All versions < V3.92). Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in KACO Meteor server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a local network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40817 | 1 Siemens | 2 Logo!, Siplus Logo! | 2026-10-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05). Affected devices do not conduct certain validations when interacting with them. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to change time of the device, which means the device could behave differently. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40816 | 1 Siemens | 2 Logo!, Siplus Logo! | 2026-10-13 | 7.6 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05). Affected devices do not conduct certain validations when interacting with them. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to manipulate the devices IP address, which means the device would not be reachable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40815 | 1 Siemens | 2 Logo!, Siplus Logo! | 2026-10-13 | 7.2 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05). Affected devices do not properly validate the structure of TCP packets in several methods. This could allow an attacker to cause buffer overflows, get control over the instruction counter and run custom code. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54678 | 1 Siemens | 13 Simatic Pcs Neo, Simatic S7-plcsim, Simatic Step 7 and 10 more | 2026-10-13 | 8.2 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 (All versions < V6.0 SP1 Update 1), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC STEP 7 V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 (All versions < V20 Update 4), SIMATIC WinCC V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC WinCC V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC WinCC V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMATIC WinCC V20 (All versions < V20 Update 4), SIMOCODE ES V17 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V18 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V19 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V20 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.4 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.5 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.6 (All versions < V5.6 SP1 HF7), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.7 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V17 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V18 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V19 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V20 (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V19 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V20 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V19 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V20 (TIA Portal) (All versions), TIA Portal Cloud V17 (All versions), TIA Portal Cloud V18 (All versions < V6.3.0.2), TIA Portal Cloud V19 (All versions < V5.2.1.1), TIA Portal Cloud V20 (All versions < V5.2.2.2), TIA Portal Test Suite V20 (All versions < V20 Update 4). Affected products do not properly sanitize Interprocess Communication input received through a Windows Named Pipe accessible to all local users. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to cause a type confusion and execute arbitrary code within the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2011-3389 | 9 Canonical, Debian, Google and 6 more | 21 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Chrome and 18 more | 2026-10-09 | N/A |
| The SSL protocol, as used in certain configurations in Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Opera, and other products, encrypts data by using CBC mode with chained initialization vectors, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain plaintext HTTP headers via a blockwise chosen-boundary attack (BCBA) on an HTTPS session, in conjunction with JavaScript code that uses (1) the HTML5 WebSocket API, (2) the Java URLConnection API, or (3) the Silverlight WebClient API, aka a "BEAST" attack. | ||||
| CVE-2021-23337 | 5 Lodash, Netapp, Oracle and 2 more | 29 Lodash, Active Iq Unified Manager, Cloud Manager and 26 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.2 High |
| Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26140 | 6 Alfa, Arista, Cisco and 3 more | 389 Awus036h, Awus036h Firmware, C-100 and 386 more | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. | ||||