Export limit exceeded: 10764 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10764 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-85950 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Marklogic Server | 2026-10-13 | 8.4 High |
| Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 contain an authorization flaw that could allow a remote attacker with administrative privileges to access authentication material associated with higher-privileged users, potentially resulting in unauthorized administrative access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85953 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Marklogic Server | 2026-10-13 | 8.5 High |
| Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 contain privileged legacy InfoStudio modules that do not sufficiently validate user-controlled file paths and user-context values. Exploitation could result in unauthorized access to server files or execution under an unintended identity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85954 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Marklogic Server | 2026-10-13 | 8.6 High |
| Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 can evaluate user-controlled values supplied to certain higher-order XQuery functions in an elevated security context, which could result in privilege escalation beyond the attacker's granted permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85955 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Marklogic Server | 2026-10-13 | 9.9 Critical |
| Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 allow a remote attacker with query-execution access to invoke an XQuery evaluation function without the additional required evaluation privilege, which could result in server-side code execution with elevated permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85956 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Marklogic Server | 2026-10-13 | 9.6 Critical |
| Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 allow a remote attacker with delegated database-administrator privileges to perform backup or restore operations on forests outside the authorized database scope, which could result in unauthorized access to or modification of security-critical data. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11218 | 1 Redhat | 7 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Ironic and 4 more | 2026-10-13 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability was found in `podman build` and `buildah.` This issue occurs in a container breakout by using --jobs=2 and a race condition when building a malicious Containerfile. SELinux might mitigate it, but even with SELinux on, it still allows the enumeration of files and directories on the host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109667 | 1 Frappe | 1 Erpnext | 2026-10-12 | 8.8 High |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.111.0 and 16.x before 16.22.0 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in a record-creation endpoint that takes the record type from the request and inserts the record with permission checks disabled. Any authenticated user, including one holding no operational role, can supply a privileged record type to create privileged accounts and take full control of the site. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109317 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav-plugin-api | 2026-10-12 | 7.2 High |
| Grav grav-plugin-api before 1.0.36 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows delegated user managers to obtain super-admin access by storing positive scalar admin or api parent grants. Attackers with api.users.write can edit account access maps or invitations so the inheriting permission resolver satisfies requireSuper checks, accessing super-only API endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95594 | 2 Cozy Vision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Wordpress-extensions | 2 Sms Alert Order Notifications, Sms Alert Order Notifications | 2026-10-12 | 8.1 High |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Cozy Vision Technologies Pvt. Ltd. SMS Alert Order Notifications sms-alert allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects SMS Alert Order Notifications: from n/a through 4.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108825 | 2 Ruoyi, Yangzongzhuan | 2 Ruoyi, Ruoyi | 2026-10-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in yangzongzhuan RuoYi up to 4.8.3. This affects the function checkRoleAllowed of the file /system/role/authDataScope. Such manipulation of the argument roleKey leads to improper privilege management. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108835 | 1 Yungengxin | 1 Yun Jia Security Guard | 2026-10-12 | 4.4 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in Yungengxin Yun Jia Security Guard up to 2.7.1.9. Impacted is the function sub_14000885C in the library kgameprotect.sys. Executing a manipulation of the argument Pid can lead to improper privilege management. The attack requires local access. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108812 | 1 Semcms | 1 Semcms | 2026-10-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in SEMCMS up to 5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /admin/SEMCMS_User.php?Class=Deleted&CF=user. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108788 | 1 Deepseek-ai | 1 Deepseek-harness | 2026-10-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in deepseek-ai deepseek-harness up to 0.1.1-rc.2. The impacted element is the function spawn of the component Sandbox. Executing a manipulation of the argument Profile can lead to sandbox issue. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92975 | 2026-10-11 | 8.1 High | ||
| The Groundhogg — CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 4.8.3 via the `create_support_user()` function. This is due to the function identifying the support account solely by matching against publicly hardcoded constants — `user_login` `'groundhogg'` and email addresses `'support@groundhogg.io'` / `'help@groundhogg.io'` — where the `in_array()` email-equality check at line 238 is not a security boundary because any user fully controls their own email value. This makes it possible for an attacker with an account whose `user_login` is `'groundhogg'` and whose `user_email` matches one of the hardcoded support constants to have that account silently promoted to administrator — and additionally to super admin on multisite when the triggering administrator holds `manage_network_options` — resulting in full site takeover. Exploitation requires a two-actor flow: the attacker must first obtain or pre-plant an account with the hardcoded credentials (possible when open user registration is enabled or another account-creation path exists), after which a legitimate administrator must invoke the support-access feature via the `submit_ticket` or `process_send_support_access` entry points to trigger the promotion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77183 | 2026-10-11 | 8.8 High | ||
| The FooSales – Point of Sale (POS) for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation via account takeover in all versions up to, and including, 1.43.0. This is due to the plugin not properly validating a user's identity prior to updating their details like email. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with FooSales Cashier-level access and above, to change arbitrary user's email addresses, including administrators, and leverage that to reset the user's password and gain access to their account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108506 | 1 Zte | 1 Z80 Ultra | 2026-10-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| ZTE Z80 Ultra's system interfaces do not have robust invocation authentication, with inadequate access control. Third-party apps may call the interfaces through reflection and retrieve relevant information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108505 | 1 Zte | 1 Z80 Ultra | 2026-10-11 | 3.3 Low |
| ZTE Z80 Ultra has a local information disclosure vulnerability. Third-party applications can capture data returned by system interfaces to obtain device-related information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108504 | 1 Zte | 1 Z80 Ultra | 2026-10-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| ZTE Z80 Ultra has an unauthorized information disclosure vulnerability. The access control for methods within the framework is insufficient. An attacker can exploit this method to read device-related information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108502 | 1 Zte | 1 Z80 Ultra | 2026-10-11 | 3.3 Low |
| ZTE Z80 Ultra contains an information disclosure vulnerability, through which third-party applications can read relevant information by hooking system APIs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108501 | 1 Zte | 1 Zte Z80 Ultra | 2026-10-11 | 5.7 Medium |
| ZTE Z80 Ultra has a system interface permission verification defect. The interface lacks necessary access control, and relevant information can be read by reflectively invoking the interface. | ||||