Export limit exceeded: 10893 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10893 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-78388 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-10-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108481 | 2026-10-12 | 7.4 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Patreon Patreon WordPress patreon-connect allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Patreon WordPress: from n/a through 1.10.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108479 | 2026-10-12 | 8.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Patreon Patreon WordPress patreon-connect allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Patreon WordPress: from n/a through 1.9.17. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84312 | 1 0xjacky | 1 Nginx-ui | 2026-10-12 | 7.1 High |
| Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. Prior to 2.4.1, GetCasdoorUri uses the configured Casdoor application name as a constant OAuth state value and CasdoorCallback does not compare the submitted state with a value bound to the initiating browser session. An unauthenticated attacker can cause a victim's browser to complete an attacker-controlled Casdoor authorization flow, and the callback can mint a Nginx UI session for the identity returned by that authorization code. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109366 | 2 Zcashfoundation, Zfnd | 2 Zebra, Zebra | 2026-10-12 | 3.7 Low |
| Zebra before 6.4.0 contains an improper integrity validation vulnerability in the inbound gossip download path that allows unauthenticated peers to force dropping of new blocks without penalty. Attackers can serve a real block with a coinbase scriptSig rewritten to height 1, which keeps the ZIP-244 block hash, triggering a behind-tip drop before consensus validation and delaying tip discovery for mining backends. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105280 | 1 Hexpm | 1 Hex | 2026-10-12 | N/A |
| Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in hexpm hex allows a package mirror to substitute the tarball that mix hex.package fetch PACKAGE VERSION --output - writes to standard output. Hex compares a fetched tarball's inner and outer checksums with the repository's signed registry before writing it to a file or unpacking it. The standard output branch of mix hex.package fetch writes the bytes returned by Hex.SCM.fetch/3 without that comparison, and Hex.SCM.fetch/3 doesn't verify freshly downloaded tarballs itself. When a mirror configured with HEX_MIRROR_URL or mirror_url serves altered bytes, the command prints them and exits successfully, while the same fetch with --output FILE fails with a checksum mismatch. Hex also prints diagnostics to standard output while the command runs: the body of a failed HTTP response from the update check or a registry fetch, and API warnings from the x-hex-message header. A mirror that answers one of those requests with an error whose body is a tar archive gets that archive written to standard output ahead of the verified tarball, so a pipeline that unpacks standard output extracts the mirror's files. This happens even when the checksum check then fails, because the archive is already on standard output. This issue affects hex: from 0.20.2 before 2.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84166 | 2026-10-12 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Hotel Booking WordPress plugin through 3.8 does not implement CSRF protection on its administrative booking order management, allowing attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into creating, deleting, or modifying arbitrary booking order records via a forged request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108800 | 2 Ruoyi, Yangzongzhuan | 2 Ruoyi, Ruoyi | 2026-10-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in yangzongzhuan RuoYi 4.8.3. The affected element is an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108738 | 1 Traccar | 1 Traccar | 2026-10-11 | 4.2 Medium |
| Traccar 5.7 through 6.16.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to log victims into attacker-controlled accounts because the OpenID Connect callback never validates the OAuth state parameter. Attackers can induce a victim's browser to load /api/session/openid/callback with their own authorization code, causing data the victim enters, such as registered devices, to land in the attacker's account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103305 | 2026-10-11 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Prenotazioni WordPress plugin through 1.7.5 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when saving its settings, and does not escape some of them when outputting them, allowing unauthenticated users to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against administrators and site visitors. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98255 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-11 | 7.0 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: exclude old ACKs from tcp fast path Exclude old ACKs before SND.UNA from the tcp fast path as well as ACKs after SND.NXT. Such ACKs will fall through to the slow path, where tcp_ack() performs the appropriate validation and challenge ACK handling according to RFC5961 and Commit 3d501dd326fb1c7 ("tcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never sent"). This prevents old ACKs from being accepted or modifying connection state as part of the fast path before appropriate ACK validation is applied. In particular, this prevents payload carried by a segment with an excessively old ACK from advancing RCV.NXT before the ACK is rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108553 | 1 Openrefine | 1 Openrefine | 2026-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| OpenRefine through 3.10.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the get-rows command that allows remote attackers to execute Jython facet expressions. Attackers can lure a user to a malicious page issuing a cross-origin GET with a crafted engine parameter, executing operating system commands as the OpenRefine user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96671 | 2026-10-09 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in fifu.app Featured Image from URL featured-image-from-url allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Featured Image from URL: from n/a through 6.0.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62026 | 2026-10-09 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MIGHTYminnow Dashboard Notes dashboard-notes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Dashboard Notes: from n/a through 1.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4431 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Tomcat, Jboss Data Grid, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 3 more | 2026-10-09 | N/A |
| org/apache/catalina/filters/CsrfPreventionFilter.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.32 allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism via a request that lacks a session identifier. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106216 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-10-09 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-site request forgery in ReadingList in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-107809 | 1 0xjacky | 1 Nginx-ui | 2026-10-09 | 8.8 High |
| Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. From 2.0.0 until 2.5.0, AuthRequired accepts a browser-managed token cookie as an API credential after the front end stores the JWT in that cookie. Because management endpoints do not universally require a CSRF token or perform Origin or Referer validation, a remote attacker can induce a logged-in administrator's browser to submit authenticated cross-site state-changing requests, including POST /api/configs. The attack requires an administrator account without OTP/Passkey or a target endpoint that does not require secure-session proof. The attacker cannot read the cross-origin response but can modify Nginx configuration, trigger reloads, or invoke other management operations reachable with the victim's session. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86850 | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| The SKU Error Fixer for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not perform any capability or nonce checks on two of its AJAX actions, which are also available to unauthenticated users, allowing them to permanently delete product variations it classifies as obsolete, and to disclose those variations' details, with no recoverable copy left behind. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85348 | 2026-10-09 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The GDPR Data Request Form WordPress plugin through 1.7.1 does not have CSRF protection when updating one of its settings, allowing attackers to change that setting via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107831 | 1 Banq | 1 Jivejdon | 2026-10-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| Jivejdon through 5.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform state-changing actions by abusing GET endpoints lacking anti-CSRF tokens. Attackers can lure authenticated users to crafted links targeting /account/protected/delAll, /account/protected/sub/delSub, or /message/updateAction to delete private messages and subscriptions or rename threads. | ||||