Export limit exceeded: 407789 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (407789 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-63792 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Gitea's collaborative-owner authorization path for reading cross-repository reusable workflows does not exclude fork pull request runs. An approved fork workflow targeting a private repository can read workflow files from another private repository that trusts the base repository's owner through collaborative-owner configuration. The issue exposes private reusable workflow contents at caller-selected Git refs; it does not itself grant write access or code execution in the other repository. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63021 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Gitea's Swift package parser limits each manifest to 128 KiB but does not limit the number of manifests or their aggregate size before reading them into memory. An authenticated user with package-publish permission can upload a highly compressed archive containing many manifests, causing allocations far larger than the uploaded archive. This can exhaust memory, terminate the process, or cause request failures. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62925 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Gitea parses Alpine package uploads before enforcing package-size quotas and does not bound the decompressed .PKGINFO data or its dependency and provides entry counts. An authenticated user with package-publish permission can upload a small, highly compressed archive that causes disproportionately large memory allocations during parsing and metadata generation. On memory-constrained deployments, this can terminate the process or otherwise disrupt availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-60021 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Gitea's initial GitLab migration version probe uses an HTTP client without a timeout and does not attach the migration task's cancellation context. An authenticated user who can start migrations can target an attacker-controlled server that keeps the response open indefinitely. The request continues after task cancellation and can exhaust the migration worker pool, preventing other migrations from progressing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-60018 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Gitea's OneDev migration downloader reads the entire remote version response into memory without a size limit and uses a client without a timeout. An authenticated user who can start a repository migration can direct it to an attacker-controlled OneDev-compatible server returning an oversized or never-ending response. This can consume memory and hold migration workers, impairing service availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-60010 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Gitea's repository-side team-link API allows a repository administrator who is not an organization owner to attach organization teams to a repository despite RepoAdminChangeTeamAccess being disabled. The endpoint does not enforce the organization's restriction on repository administrators changing team access. This allows unauthorized changes to which organization teams receive repository access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-60008 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Gitea's Jupyter notebook renderer inserts the notebook's language_info.name metadata into a CSS class attribute while disabling sanitization and rendering directly in the main document without an iframe sandbox. A malicious repository notebook can supply multiple CSS classes that create a viewport-covering overlay and intercept clicks when another user views it. The reported impact is UI redress; script execution was not demonstrated. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59774 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Gitea's Org-mode markup renderer processes INCLUDE directives supplied to the repository markup endpoint without preventing access to server-side files. An unauthenticated attacker can use a suitable public repository to read files accessible to the Gitea service account. If the disclosed files include app.ini and its INTERNAL_TOKEN, the attacker can chain the disclosure with internal logger access to modify a Git hook and execute commands as the Gitea service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59766 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Gitea's starred-repository and tracked-time API endpoints do not re-check current repository permissions before returning data associated with the requesting user. A user whose access to a private repository has been revoked can still retrieve repository metadata through /api/v1/user/starred and private issue titles through /api/v1/user/times. The disclosure depends on relationships or tracked-time entries created before access was revoked. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25946 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| When OpenID sign-in is enabled, Gitea accepts a user-supplied OpenID URL and performs discovery requests without validating the destination against internal network addresses. An unauthenticated remote attacker can cause the server to contact loopback or private-network HTTP services. This can expose internal service behavior and enable interaction with resources that are not directly reachable by the attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94578 | 2 Broadcom, Brocade | 2 Fabric Operating System, Fabric Os | 2026-10-14 | 8.8 High |
| Brocade Fabric OS versions before 10.0.1 contain an authorization logic vulnerability in the AAA (Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting) integration framework allows remote authenticated users to gain root-equivalent chassis access controls. By returning specific, crafted Vendor-Specific Attributes (VSAs) or directory claims from an external identity provider (such as RADIUS, LDAP, TACACS+, or Federated IDP), an account can bypass administrative role restriction checks during session establishment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85433 | 1 Themoos | 1 Essential-moos | 2026-10-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| MOOS essential-moos pShare through 10.0.1 fails to properly authorize PSHARE_CMD messages, allowing any publisher to reconfigure network routes and listeners at runtime. Attackers can send crafted PSHARE_CMD messages with cmd=output or cmd=input parameters to open new listeners on arbitrary addresses and redirect or duplicate bus traffic to attacker-controlled destinations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94575 | 2 Broadcom, Brocade | 2 Fabric Operating System, Fabric Os | 2026-10-14 | 5.7 Medium |
| A logic vulnerability in Brocade Fabric OS versions before 10.0.1 web management framework allows an authenticated, low-privileged user to bypass inner Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) checks under specific environmental conditions. Successful exploitation lowers the system authorization mode for the active session context, allowing access to restricted configuration settings intended exclusively for administrative roles. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97315 | 2026-10-14 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The Responsive Blocks WordPress plugin before 2.3.0 does not sanitise or escape some of the values submitted with its Form block before adding them to the HTML notification email sent to the site owner, allowing unauthenticated users to inject arbitrary HTML, such as phishing links, into that email. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97278 | 2026-10-14 | 7.2 High | ||
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in WP SYNTEX Polylang polylang allows Object Injection.This issue affects Polylang: from n/a through 3.8.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96904 | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The AWP Classifieds WordPress plugin before 4.4.9 does not verify that a request is authorised to view a listing when a payment transaction is referenced, allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass the ownership check on the ad submission page and read the private contact email stored on any listing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96900 | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Cart Abandonment Recovery for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.1.4 does not verify ownership of the email address used to select an abandoned-cart record before deleting or overwriting it, allowing unauthenticated attackers who know a customer's email to destroy or tamper with that customer's stored abandoned-cart data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95115 | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High | ||
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in libwebsockets main 106d542c allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LEJP JSON parser | ||||
| CVE-2026-94360 | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Paymentfor Gateway for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.0.6 does not verify the authenticity of an inbound payment notification before marking an order as paid, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark orders as paid without any payment being completed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94261 | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Sifalo Pay WordPress plugin before 2.5.3 does not verify that a payment transaction identifier belongs to the order it is confirming, nor that the requester owns that order, allowing unauthenticated attackers holding one valid transaction identifier from a payment of their own to mark arbitrary pending orders as paid. | ||||