Export limit exceeded: 52959 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 16902 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16902 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-83438 | 1 Oracle | 2 E-business Suite, Engineering | 2026-10-09 | 8.2 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Engineering product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Engineering. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Engineering, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Engineering accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Engineering accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-83437 | 1 Oracle | 2 E-business Suite, Engineering | 2026-10-09 | 7.7 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Engineering product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Change Management). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Engineering. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Engineering, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Engineering accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.7 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-83433 | 1 Oracle | 2 Depot Repair, E-business Suite | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Depot Repair product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Depot Repair Diagnostics). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Depot Repair. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Depot Repair accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Depot Repair accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-83432 | 1 Oracle | 2 Depot Repair, E-business Suite | 2026-10-09 | 8.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Depot Repair product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Estimate and Actual Charges). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Depot Repair. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Depot Repair accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Depot Repair accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-83455 | 1 Oracle | 2 Demand Signal Repository, E-business Suite | 2026-10-09 | 8.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Demand Signal Repository product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Demand Signal Repository. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Demand Signal Repository accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Demand Signal Repository accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-104335 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-09 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97332 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 User Private Files | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The User Private Files WordPress plugin before 2.2.0 does not properly protect its stored private files on multisite installations, where the rewrite rule it relies on to route file requests through its access check is never reached, allowing unauthenticated users to retrieve other users' private files directly. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16823 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-10-09 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106601 | 2026-10-09 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Automattic Jetpack jetpack allows Password Recovery Exploitation.This issue affects Jetpack: from n/a through 16.2. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3306 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Opensuse and 2 more | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Tumbleweed and 2 more | 2026-10-09 | 10 Critical |
| The mod_copy module in ProFTPD 1.3.5 allows remote attackers to read and write to arbitrary files via the site cpfr and site cpto commands. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92989 | 2026-10-09 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The SendPress Newsletters WordPress plugin through 1.26.1.20 does not check the user's capability on several newsletter-management actions, allowing any authenticated subscriber-level user to synchronise all site users into a mailing list and to drive the newsletter send queue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86850 | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| The SKU Error Fixer for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not perform any capability or nonce checks on two of its AJAX actions, which are also available to unauthenticated users, allowing them to permanently delete product variations it classifies as obsolete, and to disclose those variations' details, with no recoverable copy left behind. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11930 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-10-09 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 may not enforce authorization correctly for some web servers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98215 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-09 | 7.0 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux: preserve user SID across nested backing files SELinux saves the user file SID in a backing-file security blob so it remains available after mmap() replaces vma->vm_file with a backing file. For nested backing files (overlayfs over overlayfs, or FUSE passthrough backed by overlayfs), user_file may itself be a backing file. Its fsec->sid is the SID of the mounter that opened it, rather than the user that opened the top-level file. mprotect() then checks fd { use } against the mounter SID. This can incorrectly deny access without a domain transition, or check the wrong target SID after one. Copy the saved user SID when user_file is a backing file. Keep using the regular file SID for the first backing layer. With two nested overlayfs mounts and SELinux enforcing, mprotect(PROT_READ) returns EACCES with an fd { use } denial against the mounter SID. With this change, mprotect() succeeds. Tested on arm64 QEMU with a small BusyBox initramfs and a purpose-built SELinux policy. The original test was also repeated with Fedora Cloud Base 44 userspace and gave the same result. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98214 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-09 | 7.0 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux: recheck intermediate backing files on mprotect() mprotect() can be used to bypass the SELinux checks that mmap() performs against the intermediate layers of a stacked filesystem. mmap() checks every backing layer as the request descends through the stack. mprotect() only has the lowest backing file in vma->vm_file, so it rechecks the top-level user and the lowest mounter, but skips the mounters of every layer in between. With two nested overlayfs mounts and a policy denying mounter_t -> middle_file_t:file { execute }, a direct mmap(PROT_EXEC) is denied: avc: denied { execute } for pid=71 comm="nested_exec" path="/payload" dev="overlay" ino=9 scontext=user_u:base_r:mounter_t tcontext=user_u:object_r:middle_file_t tclass=file permissive=0 while mmap(PROT_NONE) followed by mprotect(PROT_EXEC) succeeds. Preserve each intermediate path, mounter SID and file-description SID in the backing-file security blob, copying the saved entries when another backing layer is opened. Allocate the array only for nested backing files, and release it and the path references in the backing_file_free hook. During mprotect(), recheck fd { use } and the requested inode permissions for every saved mounter, and include the intermediate layers in the execmod checks. Policy for nested stacking may then need to grant intermediate mounters what a direct mmap() already requires, and execmod on intermediate labels for binaries using text relocations. Tested on arm64 QEMU with a small BusyBox initramfs and a purpose-built SELinux policy, on a mainline tree containing commit f2381b546e7e ("fs: fix user path of nested backing files"). [PM: subject tweak] | ||||
| CVE-2026-94270 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Deema Payment Gateway | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Deema Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment provider notifications, and ships with that verification disabled by default, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark an unpaid order as paid, or to cancel or refund an existing order. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94271 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Deema Payment Gateway | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Deema Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not verify the payment with the payment provider when handling the return from the hosted checkout, and does not check the payment status or amount, allowing unauthenticated users to have orders marked as paid without any payment being taken. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94299 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Elegro Crypto Payment | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| The elegro Crypto Payment WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not require a shared secret to be configured before trusting incoming payment notification requests, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge payment confirmations and change the status of arbitrary orders on any installation where that secret has been left at its default empty value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94278 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 File Media Renamer | 2026-10-09 | 5.5 Medium |
| The File Media Renamer WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not verify that the requesting user is authorised to modify a given media attachment, allowing any user with file-upload privileges to rename attachments belonging to other users, including administrators, and to corrupt unrelated stored site data that referenced the old file path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105305 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more | 2026-10-09 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the OIDC implementation of Keycloak, specifically within the Device Authorization Grant flow. This component allows devices with limited input capabilities to obtain security tokens. The issue occurs because the flow fails to check the minimum authentication level required by a client configuration. This allows an attacker who has stolen a user's password to bypass mandatory multi-factor authentication and gain unauthorized access to the Keycloak Admin REST API. | ||||