| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| IBM Maximo Application Suite - IoT Component 9.2.0, 9.1.0, and 9.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to an infinite parsing loop when processing certain inputs. |
| IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to excessive permissions assigned to a service account. |
| IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript due to improper output encoding. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to write arbitrary files on the system. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary host files and overwrite certain application files due to improper validation of file paths. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication and escalate privileges due to improper validation of sub-requests. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access due to improper authentication. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| IBM Maximo Application Suite - Location Service for Esri Component 9.2, 9.1, and 9.0 is vulnerable to improper input validation due to an unsanitised container image reference in a Kubernetes operator template. |
| IBM Maximo Application Suite - Location Service for Esri Component 9.2, 9.1, and 9.0 is vulnerable to improper input validation due to an unsanitised container image configuration in a Kubernetes operator template. |
| IBM Maximo Application Suite - Location Service for Esri Component 9.2, 9.1, and 9.0 is vulnerable to command injection due to improper sanitisation of a user-controlled value passed to a shell command in a Kubernetes operator task. |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a local attacker to modify the BOOTP table due to improper authorization. |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to perform brute-force attacks to obtain credentials due to improper authentication. |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to enumerate user profiles due to the return of distinct error codes during the sign-on process. |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper access control. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to delete folders and applications belonging to other users due to improper functional level access control. |
| IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session |
| IBM Maximo Application Suite 8.10, 8.11, 9.0, 9.1, and 9.2 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to view arbitrary files on the system. |
| IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1060.00 through FW1060.81 is affected by a vulnerability in host firmware configuration parsing. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can write specially crafted configuration data to cause memory corruption in the host firmware boot stage during system IPL, compromising the host firmware boot stack and the hypervisor subsequently loaded by it. Successful exploitation results in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system. |